Jump to content

CmP

Contributor
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    676

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

 Content Type 

Everything posted by CmP

  1. CmP
    Review to a script: Response from script's author: (Read the image or description) Roblox Jailbreak script (#492ojibz)
  2. CmP

    GG Chatroom

    CmP commented on noblack's file in LUA scripts

    More information about ""
    Apply same check to the password as you did with username. tmp=Menu[1] for i=1,WhiteListWord:len() do check=WhiteListWord:sub(i) check="["..check.."]" tmp=tmp:gsub(check,"") end if tmp~="" then Warnings=Warnings.."\nX Bad Username.\nOnly letters, numbers and underline can be accepted." end User can (intentionally or not) input some characters that will break the list of parameters of the request.
  3. CmP
    Open the spoiler to see error screenshot.
  4. CmP
    Looks like you have troubles with it. Have read first sentence of the post and ignored everything else. You would better explain why have not you tested your changes to the original tool before creating the topic instead of defending those useless "encryption" tools you have been regularly posting here. It's really funny when you write "fixed" at the top of the web-page, but it does not work at all.
  5. CmP
    Everyone knows this "encryption" is absolutely useless when user is able to run the script. Moreover, your "NEW ONLINE XOR COMPILER" does not even work properly. It fails with the following error: And the cause of it is your lack of knowledge about how to write multi-line string literals in Lua.
  6. CmP
    But, if I am not mistaken, something like this is already possible by modifying lib that is loaded in process memory. This way is likely more limited than modifying the file itself, but it may work.
  7. CmP
  8. CmP
    Have you tried it at least? I highly doubt that searching for 500 consecutive addresses and editing all of them to one value can noticeably slow down your script. So are you sure that it does not suffice because of performance reasons? As pointed out above, editing values one-by-one in a loop is very inefficient. This approach should be used instead, if simple one with fuzzy search does not suffice: Example of implementing it: local startAddress = 0x12340000 local count = 500 local editValue = '555444' local values = {} for i = 1, count do values[i] = {address = startAddress; flags = gg.TYPE_DWORD; value = editValue} startAddress = startAddress + 4 end gg.setValues(values)
  9. CmP
    More information about ""
    Counter-question: what do you want to achieve by uploading a script with highly-redundant encryption (28 kb), when it's source code is less than 1 kb? What is the purpose of "encryption" that can't stop anyone from obtaining the source code? Have not you learned that there can not be "undecryptable encryption" for GG script yet? This was discussed so many times here, but you still believe in fairy tales. Last but not least, do you realize that this script is useless? Why reinvent the bicycle? The only possible value for this script would be it being an example for newbies to learn something, but for this it had to be posted as source code.
  10. CmP
    More information about ""
    If it is "nothing special", then why "encrypt" the file? No reason to hide the source code in this case, IMO. Source code: local configFile = gg.EXT_CACHE_DIR .. "/" .. gg.getFile():match("[^/]+$") .. ".cfg" local data = loadfile(configFile) if data ~= nil then data = data() end local last = gg.getFile() info = gg.prompt({ "Select Script To Encrypt:" }, data, {"file"}) if info == nil then os.exit() end if info == nil then os.exit() end gg.saveVariable(info, configFile) local open = io.open local read_file = function(path) local file = open(path, "rb") if not file then return nil end local content = file:read("*a") file:close() return content end Text = read_file("" .. info[1] .. "") if Text == nil then print("The directory or file name is wrong") else print(Text) end read_text_src.lua
  11. CmP
    @DESYROLLERSE, you can't blame someone for not being able/not wanting to learn by "trial and error" approach, when you are not able/don't want to do this yourself. Just remember how many times you asked me to "give you an example" (more like write the code for you)? It looked like you were not able to progress in developing your script without getting more and more "examples". When I told similar thing to you last time, you were very angry, you were definitely thinking that I had to provide you everything you need when you ask for it. So since when you've started to agree with this statement? Looks like a clear example of hipocrisy and double standards.
  12. CmP
    JZ.N_28-01 (3)_src.lua
  13. CmP
    That's what I was writing about, making it possible to "leech". But you probably don't need to worry about it, until there will be high demand on the code stored at the server.
  14. CmP
    Yep, file extension does not matter. Show the code and contents of the file. Without this info noone will be able to help in this case.
  15. CmP
    Of course not, but in this case it does not even require medium level of "skill" or something. I agree, the protection will be stronger, but.. you forgot to consider one thing. Potential "leecher" will be able to get the code received from the server by either modifying "makeRequest" function to print/save to a file returned value or by modifying "load" function to print/save to a file it's first argument. That's all, requesting info from the server is no more required, since the "leecher" got it. After this, it can be shared with anyone.
  16. CmP
    This approach looks good, but it won't guarantee protection against leechers. With some knowledge a potential leecher can easily get "ID" that is generated for his device, then just share this ID and the password to someone else. After this, "someone else" will be able to use the script by modifying "makeRequest" function to perform a "valid" (with correct ID and password) request to the server. The "leecher" even won't need to be bothered by how the ID and the request is generated, because simple modification of "makeRequest" function to print received arguments will do everything for him.
  17. CmP
    That's good idea, but how are you going to generate those IDs?
  18. CmP
    More information about ""
    Quite useful tool for inspecting libraries in process memory. Thanks for the contribution.
  19. CmP
    You write some nonsense. It's also not related with the topic anyhow. Maybe my upvote to @Lenn1's comment has "hurt" you hard enough, so that you decided to mention me?
  20. CmP
    Log of using the script produced by slightly modified Script compiler: Those checks are pretty useless, because all of them can be bypassed. Script that is executing another script can override any function used for limitations (such as "blocking hooks", "setting expiration time") there. For example, a script relies on "os.date" function to check expiration time, but the function surprisingly returns not the expected result, but "0" or something else that will make that check useless.
  21. CmP

    Template

    CmP commented on saiaapiz's file in Templates

    More information about ""
    for _=1, #Menu - 0.5 do if _ % 2 == 1 then -- ... end end is identical to for _ = 1, #Menu - 0.5, 2 do -- ... end but second option is more effective and clear.
  22. CmP
    Calling "load" function with some meaningless arguments in a loop, so that logging arguments of the function call to a separate file will produce many files with junk contents. In fact, this does not "block" anything. Actual code (in compiled or non-compiled form) will still be logged to a file, if script contains it.
  23. CmP
    @noblack, you forgot to delete the line in function "main". Also isVisible function does not accept arguments, so that "true" in this line is redundant. Moreover, this only works because of how Lua deals with extra arguments. From the Lua 5.3 reference manual (https://www.lua.org/manual/5.3/manual.html#3.4.11) : Another thing is that value returned by "prompt" function needs to be checked (because the dialog may be cancelled, in some cases accidentally) as well as value that is stored in "Result[4]", but I suggest you to leave these improvements to be done by the author of the topic (if he needs them at all).
  24. CmP

    LUA scripting

    CmP replied to Enyby's topic in Guides

    You need to learn Lua and GG API, because the result can not be achieved without knowledge. There are at least 2 mistakes in your script because of which "it's not freezing": 1. Wrong usage of getListItems function. Incorrect usage: Correct usage: local list = gg.getListItems() 2. Using setValues function and expecting it to do the job of addListItems function. Incorrect (and even absurd) way to add items to the saved list: Correct way: list[1].value = '10000' list[1].freeze = true gg.addListItems(list)
  25. CmP
    Also that "UI" variable is redundant in your case. Don't use something just because others do it. Your main loop can be rewritten this way: while true do if gg.isVisible() then gg.setVisible(false) main() end gg.sleep(100) end
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.