Jump to content

NoFear

Moderators
  • Posts

    3,002
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    251

Everything posted by NoFear

  1. His issue might be an already Google synced account. Might be an order of operation type of thing. [added 1 minute later] You do realize each letter is a "word" value, decimal format. Just utf16 edit the results. Also, don't change character length unless you know what you're doing... If 6 digits, don't change. It's possible, but outside the scope of what's provided
  2. It matters though that your search matches it exactly
  3. Send screen shot of GG when you search
  4. Check memory regions. Might not have correct one selected.
  5. As I said earlier... UTF16.
  6. Could always debug. Or find the pattern and just calculate the values in excel.
  7. Mass editing values isn't the way to go about it.... You'll notice your results are cycling, it's because the data relocates every value change. If your gems change before you edit and after you search, it's no longer in your results, rendering the mass edit useless.
  8. That's going to get way too many results....
  9. Pointers are dword on armv7
  10. Must've edited something else instead. Clear game data. Start new game. After you have 2 diamonds. Follow method again. Edit: you armv8? Any results? qword -3,253,082,207
  11. Wrong memory region? Or is change in game visual only?
  12. Could edit balance directly. When your follow pointer, you'll be looking for these 3 values above what you edit 2,103,787,151 318,421,662 2,103,787,151 The search 11;6,226,015;6,881,380;7,143,521;7,209,071;6,226,020;95::25 The edit I do 1,511,355,708
  13. Is that consistent for every launch? Make sure you are using correct value too. Whether float, double, dword qword.....
  14. Gems not "possible" yet. There is something I'm missing to get it to work
  15. Mmmmm... Not for how I did it... [added 0 minutes later] When you make a badb edit It's synced like this too! (Gold isn't hacked in screen, focus was gems)
  16. Cpad if armv7... Doesn't protect it from spreading. Protects method.
  17. I'm going to try and find gems before sharing anything.
  18. Haven't had a chance
  19. Gold is possible.... I imagine more is
  20. There is easier and other method possible... I chose this route due to it being preferred way on most games and avoid detection... As for qty, yea, keep it reasonable
  21. Depends on user... That's not that difficult. Most of it just narrowing results. There is faster ways, but that was the easier to follow method.
  22. No. It's same as video. Could do it backwards. Start with 12 instead and work to 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.