WhoKnowsWho Posted March 13, 2021 Posted March 13, 2021 I'm not sure but is this a bug?? I made the loop so that it search some values but I get 0 as a result, however when I search manually I do receive the results. mobizen_20210313_121010.mp4
0 MarioRossi93i Posted March 13, 2021 Posted March 13, 2021 Whitout code is impossible understand what the script does...
0 WhoKnowsWho Posted March 13, 2021 Author Posted March 13, 2021 44 minutes ago, MarioRossi93i said: Whitout code is impossible understand what the script does... Seems that I forgot. loop = 0.1 for i = 1, 5 do gg.searchNumber(loop, gg.TYPE_DOUBLE) gg.getResults(80000) gg.editAll(500, gg.TYPE_DOUBLE) gg.clearResults() search = loop + 0.1 end
0 Sedurin Posted March 13, 2021 Posted March 13, 2021 (edited) So if i understand it correctly you want to see the result your loop does? Edited March 13, 2021 by Sedurin
0 Platonic Posted March 13, 2021 Posted March 13, 2021 2 minutes ago, Sedurin said: So if i understand it correctly you want to see the result your loop does? No, its not mandatory to see the results. I need the results to be edited. In the video it search for the value, some of the searched values get edited, but then it search 0.3 but it does not edit them. So i'm not sure...and its not only 0.3. its like skipping 2 functions: show results and edit them.
0 WhoKnowsWho Posted March 13, 2021 Author Posted March 13, 2021 2 hours ago, WhoKnowsWho said: Seems that I forgot. loop = 0.1 for i = 1, 5 do gg.searchNumber(loop, gg.TYPE_DOUBLE) gg.getResults(80000) gg.editAll(500, gg.TYPE_DOUBLE) gg.clearResults() search = loop + 0.1 end loop = 0.1 for i = 0, 98 do gg.searchNumber(loop, gg.TYPE_DOUBLE) gg.getResults(80000) gg.editAll(500, gg.TYPE_DOUBLE) gg.clearResults() loop = loop + 0.1 end This is the one I'm using*
0 MonkeySAN Posted March 13, 2021 Posted March 13, 2021 1 hour ago, WhoKnowsWho said: loop = 0.1 for i = 0, 98 do gg.searchNumber(loop, gg.TYPE_DOUBLE) gg.getResults(80000) gg.editAll(500, gg.TYPE_DOUBLE) gg.clearResults() loop = loop + 0.1 end This is the one I'm using* thats strange...the script was just fine. already test it.
0 MarioRossi93i Posted March 13, 2021 Posted March 13, 2021 it doesn't seem like a code problem, maybe some values can't be changed. if you manually change the values and then do a new search do you get results? 2
0 WhoKnowsWho Posted March 13, 2021 Author Posted March 13, 2021 21 minutes ago, MonkeySAN said: thats strange...the script was just fine. already test it. When you run it and search the value 0.3 manully do you get results ? Because if so they were never edited either. I really think that it is a bug because the script does search the value but it does not edit each search and its because the results somehow do not appear. I do not know why. 1
0 WhoKnowsWho Posted March 13, 2021 Author Posted March 13, 2021 Just now, MarioRossi93i said: it doesn't seem like a code problem, maybe some values can't be changed. if you manually change the values and then do a new search do you get results? No, the values can be changed. In the video you can see me searching the value manually. They can be edited. But in the script you can see when it search for 0.3 no results appeared...so i was only thinking 2 things. 1. Maby it is not a bug because perhaps when you add a value to the search it may never be 100% the same as manually searching a value. GG may show that it is searching for 0.3 but perhaps it is looking for 0.30000000001. But ofc that is just my speculation. 2. Its a bug. I missed a lot of values that were supposed to be edited. But for now the issue is only in Double, in Float the issue does not appear.
0 Administrators Enyby Posted March 13, 2021 Administrators Posted March 13, 2021 In general, nothing is clear. The script does not have to show you at all that he found something there. This is not an animation to show anything. The fact that the values can be changed you have not shown. That they existed at the time of the search too. In general, it's not about anything at all. To assert something, you must prepare a reasoned justification and clear evidence that it happens this way, and not otherwise. This is not the case now. Until that happens, there will be no conversation. 1
0 WhoKnowsWho Posted March 13, 2021 Author Posted March 13, 2021 1 minute ago, Enyby said: In general, nothing is clear. The script does not have to show you at all that he found something there. This is not an animation to show anything. The fact that the values can be changed you have not shown. That they existed at the time of the search too. In general, it's not about anything at all. To assert something, you must prepare a reasoned justification and clear evidence that it happens this way, and not otherwise. This is not the case now. Until that happens, there will be no conversation. Ok, no problem i will provide you with clear information so that we can work towards a solution.
0 MonkeySAN Posted March 13, 2021 Posted March 13, 2021 (edited) 50 minutes ago, WhoKnowsWho said: When you run it and search the value 0.3 manully do you get results ? Because if so they were never edited either. I really think that it is a bug because the script does search the value but it does not edit each search and its because the results somehow do not appear. I do not know why. well..i tested it on something else not the game from the video. but it did worked properly. maybe you can put some kind of alert to show you what is happening really..to see if any results were found and got edited. add the results to the list would've come handy too. Edited March 13, 2021 by MonkeySAN 1
0 MonkeySAN Posted March 13, 2021 Posted March 13, 2021 (edited) maybe this will help somehow...? searching 0.3 Double manually...did gave results but when using the script... Edited March 13, 2021 by MonkeySAN
0 Administrators Enyby Posted March 13, 2021 Administrators Posted March 13, 2021 3 hours ago, WhoKnowsWho said: loop = loop + 0.1 Look like you know nothing about rounding error and think 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 is same as 0.3. It is not necessary. 2
Question
WhoKnowsWho
I'm not sure but is this a bug??
I made the loop so that it search some values but I get 0 as a result, however when I search manually I do receive the results.
20 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now