LUA scripting

[Backlift]

On 7/24/2017 at 7:08 AM, Enyby said:

print(gg.choice({'1', 'cat', 'dog', 'racoon', 'bear'}))

Im trying to use that code for this:

gg.choice({'Hack Coins'}, {'Hack Energy,Shield or Life'})
if gg.choice() == 1 then goto coin end
if gg.choice() == 2 then goto other end
if gg.choice() == nil then print('ABORT: No value type selection') goto endall end

but it won't work and says something like this:

Bad argument, Table expected, Got number (or value)

how to define table for it?

[Enyby]

31 minutes ago, Backlift said:

but it won't work and says something like this:

Wrong usage.

local c = gg.choice({'Hack Coins', 'Hack Energy,Shield or Life'})
if c == 1 then goto coin end
if c == 2 then goto other end
if c == nil then print('ABORT: No value type selection') goto endall end

 

[Enyby]

In next release we make required call gg.getResults before gg.editAll. If it is not true script can end with message

Quote

You must call gg.getResults before calling gg.editAll.

Good:

	gg.clearResults()
	gg.searchNumber ('8', gg.TYPE_DWORD)
	gg.getResults(count)
	gg.editAll('1', gg.TYPE_DWORD)

Bad:

	gg.clearResults()
	gg.searchNumber ('8', gg.TYPE_DWORD)
	-- gg.getResults(count)
	gg.editAll('1', gg.TYPE_DWORD)

 

[Aufar_R]

Can you give me an example of a full code using that code?

[Backlift]

8 minutes ago, Aufar_R said:

Can you give me an example of a full code using that code?

You can view my script:

Soul Knight v1.3.3 Script

It uses "gg.getResults()" before modification.

 

[Enyby]

17 minutes ago, Aufar_R said:

Can you give me an example of a full code using that code?

-- good	
gg.clearResults()
gg.searchNumber ('8', gg.TYPE_DWORD)
gg.getResults(10) -- we load first 10 results or less
gg.editAll('8', gg.TYPE_DWORD) -- we change all loaded, all ok

-- bad	
gg.clearResults()
gg.searchNumber ('8', gg.TYPE_DWORD)
gg.editAll('8', gg.TYPE_DWORD) -- we try change all loaded, but we do not ask load any results, so script crash on this line

 

[Logic11211]

If I wanted to write a script with the new dword xor search... What's the proper syntax ?

[Backlift]

24 minutes ago, Logic11211 said:

If I wanted to write a script with the new dword xor search... What's the proper syntax ?

I use this script:

 a = gg.prompt ( etc...) 

 z = a .. 'X7' 

 gg.searchNumber(z, gg.type_DWORD, etc...) 

That is for searching "valueX7"

 

[Backlift]

@Logic11211

see this example:

for searching 2500X4

in script it must be:

 2500 .. 'X4' 

 

between value and xor key range must be two dots (..) and the range must be in this symbol ('')

[Enyby]

14 minutes ago, Backlift said:

'X7'

One note: 7 is bad choice for dword. Dword must be aligned in 4 bytes. So this number must be 4 8 12 16 20, but not 7.

_______________________________________________

added 1 minute later

16 minutes ago, Backlift said:

I use this script:

gg.prompt return table, not value, so need

z = a[1] .. 'X7' 

_______________________________________________

added 2 minutes later

17 minutes ago, Backlift said:

 gg.searchNumber(z, gg.type_DWORD, etc...) 

That is for searching "valueX7"

"etc..." part not required started from 8.29.0. If it omitted then used defaults.

[Backlift]

1 minute ago, Enyby said:

One note: 7 is bad choice for dword. Dword must be aligned in 4 bytes. So this number must be 4 8 12 16 20, but not 7

oh, didn't knew that. thanks.

 

1 minute ago, Enyby said:

gg.prompt return table, not value, so need

z = a[1] .. 'X7' 

yeah. i actually used 

 a = v['i'] 

 

before that, thanks for saying.

[Enyby]

Just now, Backlift said:

oh, didn't knew that. thanks.

This written in app help for this search method:

Quote

Distance must respect values align. For example, dword must be aligned to 4-bytes boundary. This mean search \"40__mode_xor__7\" is useless for dword because 7 can not divide to 4.

 

[Enyby]

1 minute ago, Backlift said:

yeah. i actually used

I advice use integer indexes without specify it on creation. It can produce right order of fields on prompt. For explicit indexes order can be any.

local data = gg.prompt({'v1.0.0', 'v1.1.0', 'v2.0.0'}, {'1', '2', '3'}) -- here order fields on dialog always be as I specified

print(data[1], data[2], data[3])

-- in any examples below order can be any
local data = gg.prompt({[i]='v1.0.0', [j]='v1.1.0', [k]='v2.0.0'}, {[i]='1', [j]='2', [k]='3'}) 
local data = gg.prompt({[1]='v1.0.0', [2]='v1.1.0', [3]='v2.0.0'}, {[1]='1', [2]='2', [3]='3'}) 
local data = gg.prompt({[0]='v1.0.0', [1]='v1.1.0', [2]='v2.0.0'}, {[0]='1', [1]='2', [2]='3'}) 

 

_______________________________________________

added 2 minutes later

12 minutes ago, Enyby said:

"etc..." part not required started from 8.29.0. If it omitted then used defaults.

 

On 24.07.2017 at 2:43 AM, Enyby said:

[searchNumber] = function: searchNumber /* gg.searchNumber(string text[, int type[, bool encrypted[, int sign[, long memoryFrom[, long memoryTo]]]]]) -> true || string with error */

 

_______________________________________________

added 3 minutes later

Defaults is obviously:

gg.searchNumber(string text[, int type = gg.TYPE_AUTO[, bool encrypted = false[, int sign = gg.SIGN_EQUAL[, long memoryFrom = 0[, long memoryTo = -1]]]]]

 

[Logic11211]

Thank you @Enyby @Backlift for the very useful info

[Backlift]

@Enyby can see an example of (gg.searchfuzzy)? 

I got how start fuzzy works, but this command is complicated:

 searchFuzzy /* gg.searchFuzzy([string difference[, int type[, int sign[, long memoryFrom[, long memoryTo]]]]]) 

_______________________________________________

added 2 minutes later

example of changed value.

and unchanged.

 

the (string diffrence) option is not defined at (gg) table