- 0
Just like we change the address "value" can we also change the address "name" while using the script?
-
Similar Content
-
- 2 answers
- 1,159 views
-
- 1 answer
- 877 views
-
- 2 answers
- 1,388 views
-
- 1 answer
- 481 views
-
- 1 answer
- 949 views
-
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.
Question
_yourram
Just like we change the address "value" can we also change the address "name" while using the script?
gg.clearResults()
gg.searchNumber("8243116118139470284", 32)
gg.refineNumber("8243116118139470284", 32)
local t = gg.getResults(10)
for i,v in pairs(t) do
t[i].address = t[i].address - 0x30
t[i].flags = 1
t[i].value = 0
t[i].freeze = false
gg.setValues(t)
end
local t = gg.getResults(10)
for i,v in pairs(t) do
t[i].address = t[i].address + 0x10
t[i].flags = 16
t[i].value = 48
t[i].freeze = true
gg.setValues(t)
end
gg.clearResults()
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
21
7
4
3
Popular Days
Jan 3
13
Jan 5
8
Jan 6
6
Jan 7
6
Top Posters For This Question
_yourram 21 posts
kiynox 7 posts
MarioRossi93i 4 posts
CmP 3 posts
Popular Days
Jan 3 2024
13 posts
Jan 5 2024
8 posts
Jan 6 2024
6 posts
Jan 7 2024
6 posts
Popular Posts
kiynox
[ @_yourram ] --- No, you can still obtain all the value from the saved list and filter the items based on 'name'. In your script, you didn't even add 'name' key into 'control' table, you jus
CmP
GG API function calls such as "setValues" and "addListItems" are quite expensive in comparison to several lua instructions, so less calls will be more efficient in almost all cases. But the difference
Posted Images
36 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now