Jump to content

CmP

Contributor
  • Posts

    639
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

Everything posted by CmP

  1. Neither the question itself nor how it follows from the topic of the first post is not clear, so I can only add a comment regarding "hash_code_" field. It doesn't have to be initialized (to have value that is not 0), so it's value shouldn't be used in search for instances of a string, since it can and often will be 0.
  2. Because that's how ART implements Java strings, the "4 bytes in between" is a field with the following declaration: uint32_t hash_code_;
  3. local POINTER_TAG = 0xB4 << 56 local function addTag(pointer) return pointer | POINTER_TAG end gg.clearResults() gg.searchNumber("123456789", gg.TYPE_DWORD) local results = gg.getResults(1) local address = results[1].address - 0x8 -- applying the offset local taggedAddress = addTag(address) gg.clearResults() gg.searchNumber(taggedAddress, gg.TYPE_QWORD)
  4. No, Google translate works fine, you just haven't specified what you need to implement in script. You just mentioned: but you haven't specified what script needs to do. Search for "123"? Then apply offset? How is this related to tagged pointers? Again, either describe what script needs to implement with text or show it with video.
  5. Script what? Where is description of what needs to be implemented? Is it searching, is it editing, is it something else? If describing with text is too hard, at least show what script needs to do with a video.
  6. The instruction is valid for both ARM and Thumb as per the reference manual: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0406/cb/Application-Level-Architecture/Instruction-Details/Alphabetical-list-of-instructions/VMOV--immediate-?lang=en GG assembler, though, in this case only works for ARM version of the instruction, but not for Thumb one. We can consider this to be a bug/issue of assembler in GG, since disassembling of Thumb version of the instruction works correctly.
  7. Yes, conversions from/to tagged pointer can be implemented in script. The code to add tag to pointer can be found in this post: Need help in script. I don't know if it's possible to do it automatically (#298r5x2m) And removing tag from tagged pointer can be implemented like the following: local ADDRESS_MASK = ~(0xFF << 56) local function removeTag(pointer) return pointer & ADDRESS_MASK end
  8. This is tagged pointer. There is no problem with it. You misunderstood the post from other topic, you shouldn't edit top byte of the pointer. You only need to remove it for navigating to the address in memory editor tab. For example, value of the pointer at address 0x754799F000 from the video is 0xB4000076B220F9F0, remove "B4" from it and leading zeros to get pointed address 0x76B220F9F0, then go to this address in memory editor tab and region label will be shown.
  9. Since you have already created separate topic for your question, provide the details there. Include region log, address of the value and the value itself.
  10. CmP

    Array start at 0

    Lua also allows to implement custom iterators to be used with generic "for", so one can implement traversal from 0 that way and use it like ipairs/pairs functions: -- Modified function from http://lua-users.org/wiki/IteratorsTutorial function ipairs0(t) local function iterator(t, i) i = i + 1 local v = t[i] if v ~= nil then return i, v else return nil end end return iterator, t, -1 end -- Usage example for i, v in ipairs0(t) do print(string.format("[%d] = %s", i, v)) end
  11. CmP

    Array start at 0

    It's not more complicated than to print table elements starting from key 1. Looks more like the question is about how to print table elements at all. In the most basic case to print elements with integer keys starting from 0 and without printing contents of any nested tables it's enough to have one loop: local t = {[0] = 0, 1, 2, 3} print("{") local index = 0 local element = nil while true do element = t[index] if element == nil then break end local representation = string.format(" [%d] = %s", index, element) -- implement custom type-dependent converion of value to string if needed, this one uses default conversion, i.e. string "1" and number 1 will result in the same output print(representation) index = index + 1 end print("}")
  12. Here is an example of the code to remove saved list items that don't match allowed values: local allowedValues = { [0] = true, [16777473] = true } local items = gg.getListItems() for i, v in ipairs(items) do if allowedValues[v.value] then items[i] = nil -- not including items with allowed values in table with items to be removed end end gg.removeListItems(items)
  13. CmP

    Array start at 0

    For readability of the code or the output with table representation? If for the latter, one can simply create custom function to print table contents. There are no regular arrays in Lua, only tables that are associative arrays and can be used to implement many different data structures. Tables in Lua don't have starting element by themselves, but length operator and functions from "table" library operate only on part of table with consecutive integer keys starting from 1. Your interpretation is wrong, because tables don't have defined order of traversal, it's implementation-specific. In fact official Lua doesn't include table contents in it's default procedure to convert table to string. So instead of relying on default table to string conversion in GG implementation of Lua, implement custom function that will perform conversion the way you need.
  14. CmP

    Array start at 0

    Note that metatable-based solution suggested above doesn't work as expected in all cases when key used in indexing access or indexing assignment exists in table, because "__index" and "__newindex" events are used only when key is not present in table. Though, XEKEX is right that it's not a good practice to have 0-based arrays in Lua. What is your use case for that and why 1-based arrays don't suffice?
  15. Which value for attack speed do you need to set?
  16. It's an issue with GG assembler, there is working alternative - "~A8 MOV W0, WZR". Similar question has been asked and answered in the following topic: Cant set to false arm64 (#6rdlgvj0)
  17. Because string concatenation produces new string and there are multiple usages of it in the code. Mostly yes, but format strings don't need to be passed as parameters in this case and instead of separate call to format address, do it in the same one.
  18. This is misunderstanding from my side. Table-only solution isn't an option for this case, because of requirement to have structure number in name. So solutions can be only function-based (table may be used in the function, but there is no gain from it in this case), but there is indeed some room for performance improvement in my example above - by avoiding string concatenation and using "string.format" instead.
  19. Feel free to do that. And there is no need for any credits in this case, but you can do however you prefer. No, it shouldn't, but if you have millions of iterations, then the difference between function and lookup table might become noticeable, in which case it may make sense to go with lookup table. Yes, looks correct.
  20. It looks like you need not a table, but function that returns name for value according to two parameters: structure offset and structure count. Here is an example of such function: function getNameForValue(structOffset, structCount) local name = "Structure (" .. structCount .. ")" if structOffset == 1 then name = name .. " :Unknown: " elseif structOffset == 2 then name = name .. " :Field offset: " elseif structOffset == 3 then name = name .. " :Field amount: " end return name end
  21. What's the point of "auto-destruction" of the file that is executed, if it can be simply backed up before executing it? There are no ways (without using server) to prevent script from being executed more than one time that couldn't be easily bypassed, but if you still need to have that for some reason, basic approach is to check presence of certain file and only continue execution if the file is not present and to create that file right after the check has been passed.
  22. Sorry, the answers to the questions above are present in your video. In your locale comma is decimal separator and for your values the search range that I suggested above is too narrow. Try the following search string: "1,19999~1,20001"
  23. Could it be that you use incorrect decimal separator with respect to locale that you have selected in GG? There can be 2 options of the decimal separator: dot (.) and comma (,) . Try with dot first, then with comma.
  24. This is correct approach, use range search, but make the range smaller. For example, for 1.2 search for "1.199999999~1.200000001".
  25. CmP

    ARM LDR

    This is limitation of particular variant of LDR instruction, it doesn't mean that it's not possible anyhow. But to be able to provide you reasonable answer, one needs to know what you want to achieve, why do you need to use LDR in the first place. So provide the following information (preferably in new topic): - what you are working with (function(s) name, description and instructions that it contains); - which modification you want to implement (for example, make the function return fixed value).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.