Jump to content


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Should there be a Telegram group related to GG

Recommended Posts

While Telegram has become most popular platform for hacking modding related stuff but still wonder why there is not a well organised group related to GG where anybody could share their problems ask for some king of suggestions.

But also at same time I think it should also not affects game guardian official site because i know that memebers would share apk, lua files directly in  it instead of uploading to gg site so to counter that no files should be allowed and no external links.

Only link to GG official site should be allowed

But it would be more oriented towards problems and their solutions 

As it would led to more constructive talks on various issues without any restriction but only possible if pro and elite members along with contributors to gg community agree


share your views on this topic  only then any further action could be taken.

if u don't support this idea. i have no hesitation in withdrawing it


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Want - create. Good luck to you.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

go create it, ill join. i think its very useful.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good response and support from other members is require to make it possible @Cornysz thnx


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By hit_p
      I know im posting this in the wrong section but i cant post in Off-Topic.
      I have a suggestion for the app interface, dont know if this is possible or if it would consume too much ram or something else prevented this from already being added but i tought having this would be a nice addition.
      Search 1,buttons only affect searches from currently selected search tab.

      Search 2

      Other searches

    • By Un_Known
      Introducing Some themes would be a great idea!
    • By RogerAngell2018
      Great job with your new feature `record script` devs. It would be awesome if you guys make it to recognize offset. It is great feature to auto because sometimes the value we need to chage is not a constant but nearby values is. @Enyby@d2dyno
    • By Scrayil
      Hello everyone,
      This is the situation: i would like to find a particular value that is encrypted.
      There is actually no way to find out the encryption method.
      8 is equal to 167117 and 43 is equal to 818796
      I can easily find the value using fuzzy search, but it requires too much time.
      The address is not static, and i can't even search for a part of it.
      Group search is not possible, because near values are different between devices.
      I tried using pointer scan, but there are no pointers for it.
      is there something else i can try?
      I would like to create a script for it.
      Is there anyone who can help me?
      thank you in advance!
    • By CmP
      GameGuardian's API already has big amount of useful functions that can be used in scripts. I want to offer a new function/method to extend GG scripts possibilities.
      It is not uncommon situation when user needs to perform an action with a few elements from the list (search results / saved list / memory editor). In this case, user selects desired elements and performs desired actions afterwards, doing all of these manually. This is usually fine, but sometimes user may need to perform some non-standard operations which involve elements selection (saving desired elements in specific format; performing some operations on selected elements; analyzing "behaviour" of desired elements keeping other ones in the list, etc). This is where automation with the use of scripts will come in handy.
      First step for making this possible may be adding of the function(s) to get selected elements from search results, saved list, memory editor.
      Possible prototype for such function may be:
      mixed getSelectedElements ( int source ) where parameter "source" can be one of the following constants: GG_SEARCH _RESULTS; GG_SAVED_LIST; GG_MEMORY_EDITOR;
      and returned value will be a table with selected elements or string with error (if one can occur).
      Another option is 3 functions, each of which will be intended for getting selected elements from corresponding sources. This approach may help to avoid complexity with fields of a table that will be returned (fields will probably vary depending on the source).
      Here are possible prototypes:
      mixed getSelectedResults() -- for search results mixed getSelectedListItems() -- for saved list mixed getSelectedElements() -- for memory viewer/editor Any of these options can provide the possibility to get selected elements from a script.
      Choose elements to perform actions with, trigger required operations and that's it, other elements won't be "touched", they will remain in the list (if it's search results or saved list, because memory viewer is not a customizable list).
      P. S. Some "trigger of action" when GG interface is active may be needed for comfortable work with this function(s). I think that some solution can be found, hence this should not be a big problem.
  • Create New...