Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Suggestions'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
    For example, the common name of the game: PUBG, Free Fire, Rules of Survival, Critical Ops, Mobile Legends: Bang Bang, etc.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • GameGuardian
    • Requests
    • Help
    • Guides
    • Cheats
    • Video Tutorials
    • Unintended Effects
  • General
    • General Discussion
    • Introduce yourself (:
    • Announcements
    • Website suggestions/Bugs
  • Downloads Support
    • Apps
    • LUA scripts
  • Online Multiplayer Mods
    • Altering Online Games with Gameguardian
    • Download Mods
  • Other Hacks
    • Tutorials
    • Non-GameGuardian
  • Archive
    • Archived topics

Categories

  • Official Downloads
  • Virtual spaces (no root)
  • LUA scripts
    • Forward Assault
    • Free Fire
    • PUBG
    • Rules of Survival
    • Templates
    • Tools
  • Test applications
  • Other

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Device


Discord ID

Found 3 results

  1. Greetings. In this topic I will share my suggestions about possible ways to improve GG features as well as examples of unintended behaviour of the app. Will update the topic with new findings as soon as I prepare proper explanation for them. Pointer search It's a great feature which saves us time when need to find pointers to an address or a range of addresses. However, current implementation for searchimg a range of addresses (when we specify non-zero offset) seems not best for me. In current implementation search is performed from address - offset value to adrress value. Good way to illustrate this is to show a part of "pointer_scan.lua" script (released by Enyby) where search string is being constructed: local search = (address - offset)..'~'..address gg.searchNumber(search, gg.TYPE_DWORD) My suggestion is to change this feature's implementation a bit, so the search may be performed in 1 of 3 modes: from address - offset to address (current implementation); from address to address + offset; from address - offset to address + offset. One possible way is to add something like "multi-choice" containing two options with offset directions. Total combinations of possible user inputs will be equal to 4 in this case (3 "modes" that were described above and the option when nothing is selected, in this case offset value may be ignored). In my opinion, this will add more flexibility to the feature as well as making it more "understandable" for the user. Let me know, what do you think about it. –°heers.
  2. I'm currently working on making my pixel gun 3d speedhack pro version finished and made public (will have 34 speeds as well as custom) and also a township mega hack (gold, money, xp, prices, regatta, friend gifts, barn space, barn items, etc.). Which script do you want to see? Reply with what you want me to prioritize!
  3. --- [ Introduction ] --- I do think that we should enforce some minimum criteria when user create a topic. New user tends to create some vague topic with no context or provide a little information about the topic. This could lead the topic being ignored with no reply or other members asking the topic creator for more information. It also litter the forum, not to mention that some users will reply randomly just to answer the topic. Currently, unanswered topic is being displayed in the top-section, some users can just do comment or do a random answer just only to "move the topic down": ---- --- [ Instruction ] --- When a user enters the topic creation, some placeholder text will display some instruction on how the user should write the topic. Example taken from StackOverflow: Current Game Guardian UI: --- --- [ Criteria ] --- Criteria could be customized to follow certain section. Example taken from: Mojang Bug Tracker - Description about the problem - Steps to produce the problem - Expected result - Attach some information about the problem (Screenshot, Video, Logs) --- --- [ Aftermath ] --- If the users still creates some "bad" written topics, another users can down-vote them. If some topic reaches atleast 3 down-vote, the topic creator will be informed to fix their post in a span of 1 week or 3 days. This mimick on how StackOverflow handles post but also give some chance to the users to fix their topic, instead of instantly closing the topic. If some users ignores the notification, the topic will automaticly closed. This also avoid "users" that just leave after creating a topic. --- --- [ Conclusion ] --- - Avoid the topic being ignored - Help clean the forum from unanswered topic & badly written posts - Avoid users giving a random answer - Avoid topic creators that just leave their badly written posts with no follow ups or context - Giving more uses to "Down-Vote" feature
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.