[Arm64 patch does not quite work]

There are no issues with initial version of your code, it correctly sets value of S0 register to 0.06. It may be that you just need different value to make the character run slower. Does setting the value to 2 increase movement speed or decrease?

[LUA scripting]

6 hours ago, Count_Nosferatu said:

Why are they doing this?

That's just code produced by script recording feature. Supposedly, when recording script, call to "processResume" function is inserted each time user returns from GG to game.

[Help me with this command]

Again, the same reason, function "BP1" needs to be defined before it is called. If you don't want to reorder all of the functions, then moving block of code from lines 135-143 to the end of the file may work.

[Help me with this command]

6 hours ago, SamePerson said:

I got an error at line 92

Because you need to define the functions before calling them as has been mentioned in the comment in the code above. For example: 

function HOME1()
  -- ...
end

HOME1()

And not: 

HOME1()

function HOME1()
  -- ...
end

[Help me with this command]

I guess you should use "versionName" field for that: 

-- ...

if v.versionName == VN1 then
  HOME1() -- Functions HOME1, HOME2, HOME3 need to be defined before they are used
elseif v.versionName == VN2 then
  HOME2()
elseif v.versionName == VN3 then
  HOME3()
else
  os.exit()
end

[libil2cpp.so in region Xs]

This merely means that GG hasn't correctly identified that libraries belong to the application, process of which is selected. It doesn't affect anything other than how GG classifies the regions. The regions can still be found manually and from script just fine without relying on region being classified as "Xa", "Cd", etc.

[64bit memory range problem]

local POINTER_TAG = 0xB4 << 56

local function addTag(pointer)
  return pointer | POINTER_TAG
end

gg.clearResults()
gg.searchNumber("123456789", gg.TYPE_DWORD)
local results = gg.getResults(1)
local address = results[1].address - 0x8 -- applying the offset
local taggedAddress = addTag(address)
gg.clearResults()
gg.searchNumber(taggedAddress, gg.TYPE_QWORD)

[64bit memory range problem]

No, Google translate works fine, you just haven't specified what you need to implement in script. You just mentioned: 

6 minutes ago, toanpham6001 said:

my value is "123" and offset is 0x10

but you haven't specified what script needs to do. Search for "123"? Then apply offset? How is this related to tagged pointers?

Again, either describe what script needs to implement with text or show it with video.

[64bit memory range problem]

6 minutes ago, toanpham6001 said:

how would i script it?

Script what? Where is description of what needs to be implemented? Is it searching, is it editing, is it something else? If describing with text is too hard, at least show what script needs to do with a video.

[64bit memory range problem]

Yes, conversions from/to tagged pointer can be implemented in script. The code to add tag to pointer can be found in this post: 

Need help in script. I don't know if it's possible to do it automatically (#298r5x2m)

And removing tag from tagged pointer can be implemented like the following: 

local ADDRESS_MASK = ~(0xFF << 56)

local function removeTag(pointer)
  return pointer & ADDRESS_MASK
end

[64bit memory range problem]

This is tagged pointer. There is no problem with it. You misunderstood the post from other topic, you shouldn't edit top byte of the pointer. You only need to remove it for navigating to the address in memory editor tab. For example, value of the pointer at address 0x754799F000 from the video is 0xB4000076B220F9F0, remove "B4" from it and leading zeros to get pointed address 0x76B220F9F0, then go to this address in memory editor tab and region label will be shown.

[Undetected Memory Range]

2 minutes ago, toanpham6001 said:

my top byte is already 0 what should i do?

Since you have already created separate topic for your question, provide the details there. Include region log, address of the value and the value itself.

[Array start at 0]

Lua also allows to implement custom iterators to be used with generic "for", so one can implement traversal from 0 that way and use it like ipairs/pairs functions: 

-- Modified function from http://lua-users.org/wiki/IteratorsTutorial
function ipairs0(t)
  local function iterator(t, i)
    i = i + 1
    local v = t[i]
    if v ~= nil then
      return i, v
    else
      return nil
    end
  end
  return iterator, t, -1
end

-- Usage example
for i, v in ipairs0(t) do
  print(string.format("[%d] = %s", i, v))
end

[Array start at 0]

17 minutes ago, nok1a said:

Could you perhaps provide an example function for print table starting at index zero*?

It's not more complicated than to print table elements starting from key 1. Looks more like the question is about how to print table elements at all. In the most basic case to print elements with integer keys starting from 0 and without printing contents of any nested tables it's enough to have one loop: 

local t = {[0] = 0, 1, 2, 3}

print("{")
local index = 0
local element = nil
while true do
  element = t[index]
  if element == nil then
    break
  end
  local representation = string.format("    [%d] = %s", index, element) -- implement custom type-dependent converion of value to string if needed, this one uses default conversion, i.e. string "1" and number 1 will result in the same output
  print(representation)
  index = index + 1
end
print("}")

[Array start at 0]

16 minutes ago, nok1a said:

It's for readability.

For readability of the code or the output with table representation? If for the latter, one can simply create custom function to print table contents.

35 minutes ago, nok1a said:

It doesn't start with 0 though. Which is rather the result i want to achieve.
  

Must be chronological order.

There are no regular arrays in Lua, only tables that are associative arrays and can be used to implement many different data structures. Tables in Lua don't have starting element by themselves, but length operator and functions from "table" library operate only on part of table with consecutive integer keys starting from 1. Your interpretation is wrong, because tables don't have defined order of traversal, it's implementation-specific. In fact official Lua doesn't include table contents in it's default procedure to convert table to string. So instead of relying on default table to string conversion in GG implementation of Lua, implement custom function that will perform conversion the way you need.

[Array start at 0]

Note that metatable-based solution suggested above doesn't work as expected in all cases when key used in indexing access or indexing assignment exists in table, because "__index" and "__newindex" events are used only when key is not present in table. Though, XEKEX is right that it's not a good practice to have 0-based arrays in Lua. What is your use case for that and why 1-based arrays don't suffice?

[Update variable that resist in key value of table]

22 minutes ago, nok1a said:

Hmm, i don't exactly understand why string.format over string concatenation, could you perhaps explain?

Because string concatenation produces new string and there are multiple usages of it in the code.

29 minutes ago, nok1a said:

I applied it like this to the script, This is ok?

Mostly yes, but format strings don't need to be passed as parameters in this case and instead of separate call to format address, do it in the same one.

[Update variable that resist in key value of table]

43 minutes ago, CmP said:

in which case it may make sense to go with lookup table

This is misunderstanding from my side. Table-only solution isn't an option for this case, because of requirement to have structure number in name. So solutions can be only function-based (table may be used in the function, but there is no gain from it in this case), but there is indeed some room for performance improvement in my example above - by avoiding string concatenation and using "string.format" instead.

[Update variable that resist in key value of table]

13 minutes ago, nok1a said:

Do you mind if i use your example in the script? I would attach link to this threat as i did with the range function.

Feel free to do that. And there is no need for any credits in this case, but you can do however you prefer.

16 minutes ago, nok1a said:

But i do question, if i write it in a separate function the function will be called for each loop. Will this not slow speed down drastically?

No, it shouldn't, but if you have millions of iterations, then the difference between function and lookup table might become noticeable, in which case it may make sense to go with lookup table.

18 minutes ago, nok1a said:

Is it appropriate like that?

Yes, looks correct.

[Update variable that resist in key value of table]

It looks like you need not a table, but function that returns name for value according to two parameters: structure offset and structure count. Here is an example of such function: 

function getNameForValue(structOffset, structCount)
  local name = "Structure (" .. structCount .. ")"
  if structOffset == 1 then
    name = name .. " :Unknown: "
  elseif structOffset == 2 then
    name = name .. " :Field offset: "
  elseif structOffset == 3 then
    name = name .. " :Field amount: "
  end
  return name
end

[How can i make my script works only one time?]

What's the point of "auto-destruction" of the file that is executed, if it can be simply backed up before executing it?

There are no ways (without using server) to prevent script from being executed more than one time that couldn't be easily bypassed, but if you still need to have that for some reason, basic approach is to check presence of certain file and only continue execution if the file is not present and to create that file right after the check has been passed.

[GG ERROR , USE REFINE DOUBLE]

Sorry, the answers to the questions above are present in your video. In your locale comma is decimal separator and for your values the search range that I suggested above is too narrow.

Try the following search string: "1,19999~1,20001"

[GG ERROR , USE REFINE DOUBLE]

9 minutes ago, The-Twins said:

If i search with 1,2 

,2 not found must one value 

Could it be that you use incorrect decimal separator with respect to locale that you have selected in GG?

There can be 2 options of the decimal separator: dot (.) and comma (,) . Try with dot first, then with comma.

[GG ERROR , USE REFINE DOUBLE]

51 minutes ago, The-Twins said:

But if i search 1~2 is found

This is correct approach, use range search, but make the range smaller. For example, for 1.2 search for "1.199999999~1.200000001".

[ARM LDR]

2 hours ago, Alessa- said:

Ouw not far from the instruction 

If very far away cant ?

This is limitation of particular variant of LDR instruction, it doesn't mean that it's not possible anyhow. But to be able to provide you reasonable answer, one needs to know what you want to achieve, why do you need to use LDR in the first place. So provide the following information (preferably in new topic):
  - what you are working with (function(s) name, description and instructions that it contains);
  - which modification you want to implement (for example, make the function return fixed value).