damage hack 1.0.0

Why would you upload log of the calls to GG API functions without extracting useful code from it?

Currently uploaded file is extremely redundant. Around 7500 lines containing "gg.getFile()" and only around 20 lines of actual code.

Actual code from the file:

Quote

gg.choice({ -- table(8ad8f19)
	[1] = '[RADAR/DAMAGE 100%] [[]]',
})
--[[ return: 1 ]]
gg.clearResults()
gg.searchNumber("523533590", gg.TYPE_DWORD)
gg.getResults(100)
gg.editAll("523533593", gg.TYPE_DWORD)
gg.clearResults()
gg.searchNumber("33816606;880608002::", gg.TYPE_DWORD)
gg.searchNumber("880608002", gg.TYPE_DWORD)
gg.getResults(100)
gg.editAll("880613695", gg.TYPE_DWORD)
gg.clearResults()
gg.toast("Cheat Berhasil")
gg.setVisible(false)
gg.alert(" Subscribe Xochi Gaming ")
--[[ return: 1 ]]
debug.traceback()
gg.getFile()
gg.getFile()
gg.choice({ -- table(54e300b)
	[4] = 'EXIT',
})
--[[ return: 4 ]]

 

But even this code contains some redundancy, i.e. the calls to "gg.getFile" and "debug.traceback" functions.

6 hours ago, CmP said:

Why would you upload log of the calls to GG API functions without extracting useful code from it?

Currently uploaded file is extremely redundant. Around 7500 lines containing "gg.getFile()" and only around 20 lines of actual code.

Actual code from the file:

But even this code contains some redundancy, i.e. the calls to "gg.getFile" and "debug.traceback" functions.

Maybe he doesn't own this script just reupload it

old one method still work?

12 hours ago, drei1929 said:

Maybe he doesn't own this script just reupload it

 he used hook for get codes from another script and upload file without fixing any errors xd