King Encrypt 1.0.0.7

Look i try enc, but my code (strings) not encrypted, its just dump not encrypt and Adding useless garbage code, bad my code can decrpyt easyly.

Edited May 2 by HEROGAMEOfficial

On 5/1/2025 at 8:22 PM, HEROGAMEOfficial said:

Look i try enc, but my code (strings) not encrypted, its just dump not encrypt and Adding useless garbage code, bad my code can decrpyt easyly.

Try Latest Version..

Full Convert String To Byte..King Encrypt

53 minutes ago, DanuHidayah said:

Try Latest Version..

Full Convert String To Byte..King Encrypt

Look it this, its same string not encrypt just dump with decimal, i just give comment no body can make tools to encrypt all type string in lua Except me, you can buy engine to encrypt all type string here.

Aaa see you

1 hour ago, HEROGAMEOfficial said:

Look it this, its same string not encrypt just dump with decimal, i just give comment no body can make tools to encrypt all type string in lua Except me, you can buy engine to encrypt all type string here.

Aaa see you

did you find your string?? like gg.alert("123") I need proof.. please send your Enc result script... and tell me what string did you find??

1 hour ago, HEROGAMEOfficial said:

Look it this, its same string not encrypt just dump with decimal, i just give comment no body can make tools to encrypt all type string in lua Except me, you can buy engine to encrypt all type string here.

Aaa see you

you know.. you should study more..

Edited May 6 by DanuHidayah

1 hour ago, DanuHidayah said:

you know.. you should study more..

_G["123 456"]["789"]( it funny )

1 hour ago, DanuHidayah said:

_G["123 456"]["789"]( it funny )

 

3 hours ago, DanuHidayah said:

you know.. you should study more..

HERO GAME's SELGG seems like a character mapping type. It doesn't pass the encrypted data to the decoder, unlike other tools. From what I understand, its decoder algorithm is a self-reading decoder. I might be wrong, but using io.open to read itself and using gmatch to extract the encrypted data is possible. Combined with its excessive usage of local variables, its decoder becomes insanely difficult to extract and restore.

For context, my own unreleased/private encryption tool, Pentagon, is also a character mapping type.

SELGG's outputs are structured like this: aBCD99h, where "aBCD" represents the encrypted data, "99" is the index, and "h" is the key code (as per SELGG's release notes).

In contrast, Pentagon (my private encryption) produces output like this: S7bUwBsuJdbUsnK. Here, "S" indicates it's a string (if it's "N", it's a number; if it's "F", it's a function), "7" is the index, and "bUwBsuJdbUsnK" is the encrypted data scattered randomly, with some mapped characters being part of key, PRNG calculator, and hash identifiers.

So, maybe you need to learn more, not him. Yours is very easy to reverse. I can just LASM your encryption and remove your blockers manually without breaking anything. Try that with SELGG, and you will 99% remove a crucial part of the decoder in an attempt to remove its blockers, and it will not work.

On 5/7/2025 at 1:03 AM, ARGAMINGSCRIPTS said:

 

HERO GAME's SELGG seems like a character mapping type. It doesn't pass the encrypted data to the decoder, unlike other tools. From what I understand, its decoder algorithm is a self-reading decoder. I might be wrong, but using io.open to read itself and using gmatch to extract the encrypted data is possible. Combined with its excessive usage of local variables, its decoder becomes insanely difficult to extract and restore.

For context, my own unreleased/private encryption tool, Pentagon, is also a character mapping type.

SELGG's outputs are structured like this: aBCD99h, where "aBCD" represents the encrypted data, "99" is the index, and "h" is the key code (as per SELGG's release notes).

In contrast, Pentagon (my private encryption) produces output like this: S7bUwBsuJdbUsnK. Here, "S" indicates it's a string (if it's "N", it's a number; if it's "F", it's a function), "7" is the index, and "bUwBsuJdbUsnK" is the encrypted data scattered randomly, with some mapped characters being part of key, PRNG calculator, and hash identifiers.

So, maybe you need to learn more, not him. Yours is very easy to reverse. I can just LASM your encryption and remove your blockers manually without breaking anything. Try that with SELGG, and you will 99% remove a crucial part of the decoder in an attempt to remove its blockers, and it will not work.

Little Kids :
Most Little Kids Always Want Attention...

Stupid Person :
Always Want to Be Seen as the Greatest..

Silly Person :
His Behavior Always Makes People Smile...

Yes..
You're Right..
That's You...

Hi Kid..
You Should Learn..

20 hours ago, DanuHidayah said:

Little Kids :
Most Little Kids Always Want Attention...

Stupid Person :
Always Want to Be Seen as the Greatest..

Silly Person :
His Behavior Always Makes People Smile...

Yes..
You're Right..
That's You...

Hi Kid..
You Should Learn..

Mind telling me what I need to learn, mister smarty? Decode Hero Game's SELGG completely and I'll "learn" what you ask me to. There! Do it.

 

Don't you dare log it and claim that it is "decrypted" file. If you send me log, I will immediately know that you've sent me a logged code. So, send me a completely decrypted one.

Edited May 9 by ARGAMINGSCRIPTS

7 minutes ago, ARGAMINGSCRIPTS said:

Mind telling me what I need to learn, mister smarty? Decode Hero Game's SELGG completely and I'll "learn" what you ask me to. There! Do it.

 

Don't you dare log it and claim that it is "decrypted" file. If you send me log, I will immediately know that you've sent me a logged code. So, send me a completely decrypted one.

Aren't You the One Who Underestimates My Manuscript?? From the Beginning I Asked You for Proof.. Okay Kid.. I Don't Want to Talk About Stupid Things.. And You Should Learn

 

 

Dump

3 hours ago, DanuHidayah said:

Aren't You the One Who Underestimates My Manuscript?? From the Beginning I Asked You for Proof.. Okay Kid.. I Don't Want to Talk About Stupid Things.. And You Should Learn

 

 

Dump

Well, if you have goldfish memory, let me remind you—you said the following to me:

"Little Kids :

Most Little Kids Always Want Attention...

Stupid Person :

Always Want to Be Seen as the Greatest..

Silly Person :

His Behavior Always Makes People Smile...

Yes..

You're Right..

That's You...

Hi Kid..

You Should Learn.."

Never in that message have you asked me to show proof. So, unless you made up that story of you asking me to show you proof "from the beginning," I never received that request from you.

Oh, and, the most powerful Lua GG encryption is still AsDroid's RHN enc tool. Then comes my Pentagon due to its advanced anti-decrypt/anti-debug capabilities (+ LASM obfuscation). Then, there's SELGG. If you can't decrypt SELGG, you're nowhere near that level, kid.

Your childish insults are not going to affect me. My (and Hero Game's) knowledge is far more than yours.

Since you're so offended by my and Hero Game's criticism, you shouldn't be in this field. You post useless tools; you will receive criticism. My first encryption tool, E-ARG (Encryption ARG), was brutally criticized by Hero Game. I am not childish like you to throw unnecessary tantrums at others. I took his criticism, although I never updated E-ARG (Encryption ARG) again, my Pentagon, released 6 months ago, is far superior to your useless encryption tool. 

No wonder Hero Game stopped replying to you. It's better to avoid talking to insolent fools like you.

With that useless attitude, you'll never be able to grow in this field. Just so your dumb self knows, I have knowledge of nearly every programming language, from web development to application development. You'll forever be stuck with that weird encryption tool if you don't drop that attitude of yours.

You may think that you have been winning arguments with your illogical insults with others, but others know very well that you're just someone who refuses to accept their own faults.

Any further insults from you will only show how stupid you are.

27 minutes ago, ARGAMINGSCRIPTS said:

Well, if you have goldfish memory, let me remind you—you said the following to me:

"Little Kids :

Most Little Kids Always Want Attention...

Stupid Person :

Always Want to Be Seen as the Greatest..

Silly Person :

His Behavior Always Makes People Smile...

Yes..

You're Right..

That's You...

Hi Kid..

You Should Learn.."

Never in that message have you asked me to show proof. So, unless you made up that story of you asking me to show you proof "from the beginning," I never received that request from you.

Oh, and, the most powerful Lua GG encryption is still AsDroid's RHN enc tool. Then comes my Pentagon due to its advanced anti-decrypt/anti-debug capabilities (+ LASM obfuscation). Then, there's SELGG. If you can't decrypt SELGG, you're nowhere near that level, kid.

Your childish insults are not going to affect me. My (and Hero Game's) knowledge is far more than yours.

Since you're so offended by my and Hero Game's criticism, you shouldn't be in this field. You post useless tools; you will receive criticism. My first encryption tool, E-ARG (Encryption ARG), was brutally criticized by Hero Game. I am not childish like you to throw unnecessary tantrums at others. I took his criticism, although I never updated E-ARG (Encryption ARG) again, my Pentagon, released 6 months ago, is far superior to your useless encryption tool. 

No wonder Hero Game stopped replying to you. It's better to avoid talking to insolent fools like you.

With that useless attitude, you'll never be able to grow in this field. Just so your dumb self knows, I have knowledge of nearly every programming language, from web development to application development. You'll forever be stuck with that weird encryption tool if you don't drop that attitude of yours.

You may think that you have been winning arguments with your illogical insults with others, but others know very well that you're just someone who refuses to accept their own faults.

Any further insults from you will only show how stupid you are.

Here's your "very strong" encryption v1.0.0.1. Have your "string.char" no key, no PRNG, no Deterministic system encryption tool.

2 hours ago, ARGAMINGSCRIPTS said:

Here's your "very strong" encryption v1.0.0.1. Have your "string.char" no key, no PRNG, no Deterministic system encryption tool.

Wait for the next update bro

2 hours ago, ARGAMINGSCRIPTS said:

Here's your "very strong" encryption v1.0.0.1. Have your "string.char" no key, no PRNG, no Deterministic system encryption tool.

Just a Little Addition of Varvarg..

 

Oh? You wanted me to leak your encryption tool?

Edited May 10 by ARGAMINGSCRIPTS

8 hours ago, jull_0107 said:

Apasih adek", brisik amat, ngebacot doang yang pandai, gaya" bisa Dec all script, tapi banyak alasan, lu sama kek abg lu tuh si Hero Game, sama" indo, ngebacot doang, action kaga ada

Full Protect #1

Anti Hook

Anti Decrypt

Anti Log

Anti Load

Anti Lasm

 

Ga usah brisik lagi ya adek"

[Jᴜʟʟ4Yᴏᴜ].King EncrYpt_[ Special Edition ].lua

@d2dyno @Enyby @Trasd not English (out of rules)

8 hours ago, jull_0107 said:

Apasih adek", brisik amat, ngebacot doang yang pandai, gaya" bisa Dec all script, tapi banyak alasan, lu sama kek abg lu tuh si Hero Game, sama" indo, ngebacot doang, action kaga ada

Full Protect #1

Anti Hook

Anti Decrypt

Anti Log

Anti Load

Anti Lasm

 

Ga usah brisik lagi ya adek"

[Jᴜʟʟ4Yᴏᴜ].King EncrYpt_[ Special Edition ].lua

If you have enc tools i want try, hero game he selgg, and Danul is king encrypt, then argaming is eargg they comment because they have the tools, you?

Don't just brag, come on.

On 5/10/2025 at 11:19 AM, ARGAMINGSCRIPTS said:

Oh? You wanted me to leak your encryption tool?

change all function().. like searchNumber to saveVariable.. using debug.setHook.. seems like a decent way... And I don't need permission to do it... right?

On 5/6/2025 at 7:53 PM, HEROGAMEOfficial said:

Look it this, its same string not encrypt just dump with decimal, i just give comment no body can make tools to encrypt all type string in lua Except me, you can buy engine to encrypt all type string here.

Aaa see you

change all function().. like searchNumber to saveVariable.. using debug.setHook.. seems like a decent way... And I don't need permission to do it... right?