Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know im posting this in the wrong section but i cant post in Off-Topic.

I have a suggestion for the app interface, dont know if this is possible or if it would consume too much ram or something else prevented this from already being added but i tought having this would be a nice addition.

Search 1,buttons only affect searches from currently selected search tab.

1.thumb.jpg.31f9f5c72e3b8e802583a37c0c0edc4c.jpg

 

Search 2

2.thumb.jpg.1189afeb2dcc158a40bcfd411a72e79f.jpg

 

Other searches

3.thumb.jpg.dc4c9febb3c616a8e97a67fe344db902.jpg

 

 

 

Edited by hit_p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hit_p said:

I know im posting this in the wrong section but i cant post in Off-Topic.

I have a suggestion for the app interface, dont know if this is possible or if it would consume too much ram or something else prevented this from already being added but i tought having this would be a nice addition.

Search 1,buttons affect selected search results.

1.thumb.jpg.31f9f5c72e3b8e802583a37c0c0edc4c.jpg

 

Search 2

2.thumb.jpg.1189afeb2dcc158a40bcfd411a72e79f.jpg

 

Other searches

3.thumb.jpg.dc4c9febb3c616a8e97a67fe344db902.jpg

 

 

 

you mean oly for example ca region and not anon umus?if yes untick the anonimus in options, if you mean some adress to other adress  search distance is possible in  option button in all memory have from  to adress option, 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have some plans about multi search.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Enyby said:

We have some plans about multi search.

great to  know thanks bro, now i understand what he mean , yes is a goog idea to filter values, sorry oftopic but is for not create a new tread for this question the option  deep read what values it seraches? i mean i understand deep is more profunde but what the diference in the gameguardian search values?thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, nalcwap said:

the option  deep read what values it seraches? i mean i understand deep is more profunde but what the diference in the gameguardian search values?thanks

I do not understand question.

And better create new topic for ask something other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Enyby said:

I do not understand question.

And better create new topic for ask something other.

ok thanks, i mean we have a option called deap read, what the values he find compared without ativate this option?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ON normal firmware it is same. It is option for bugged firmware.

Read context help for this option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Enyby said:

ON normal firmware it is same. It is option for bugged firmware.

Read context help for this option.

ok thanks bro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Un_Known
      Introducing Some themes would be a great idea!
    • By Un_Known
      While Telegram has become most popular platform for hacking modding related stuff but still wonder why there is not a well organised group related to GG where anybody could share their problems ask for some king of suggestions.
      But also at same time I think it should also not affects game guardian official site because i know that memebers would share apk, lua files directly in  it instead of uploading to gg site so to counter that no files should be allowed and no external links.
      Only link to GG official site should be allowed
      But it would be more oriented towards problems and their solutions 
      As it would led to more constructive talks on various issues without any restriction but only possible if pro and elite members along with contributors to gg community agree
      Thnx 
      share your views on this topic  only then any further action could be taken.
      if u don't support this idea. i have no hesitation in withdrawing it
       
    • By RogerAngell2018
      Great job with your new feature `record script` devs. It would be awesome if you guys make it to recognize offset. It is great feature to auto because sometimes the value we need to chage is not a constant but nearby values is. @Enyby@d2dyno
    • By CmP
      GameGuardian's API already has big amount of useful functions that can be used in scripts. I want to offer a new function/method to extend GG scripts possibilities.
      It is not uncommon situation when user needs to perform an action with a few elements from the list (search results / saved list / memory editor). In this case, user selects desired elements and performs desired actions afterwards, doing all of these manually. This is usually fine, but sometimes user may need to perform some non-standard operations which involve elements selection (saving desired elements in specific format; performing some operations on selected elements; analyzing "behaviour" of desired elements keeping other ones in the list, etc). This is where automation with the use of scripts will come in handy.
      First step for making this possible may be adding of the function(s) to get selected elements from search results, saved list, memory editor.
      Possible prototype for such function may be:
      mixed getSelectedElements ( int source ) where parameter "source" can be one of the following constants: GG_SEARCH _RESULTS; GG_SAVED_LIST; GG_MEMORY_EDITOR;
      and returned value will be a table with selected elements or string with error (if one can occur).
      Another option is 3 functions, each of which will be intended for getting selected elements from corresponding sources. This approach may help to avoid complexity with fields of a table that will be returned (fields will probably vary depending on the source).
      Here are possible prototypes:
      mixed getSelectedResults() -- for search results mixed getSelectedListItems() -- for saved list mixed getSelectedElements() -- for memory viewer/editor Any of these options can provide the possibility to get selected elements from a script.
      Choose elements to perform actions with, trigger required operations and that's it, other elements won't be "touched", they will remain in the list (if it's search results or saved list, because memory viewer is not a customizable list).
      P. S. Some "trigger of action" when GG interface is active may be needed for comfortable work with this function(s). I think that some solution can be found, hence this should not be a big problem.
    • By HVC
      Sometimes i need find some value in the memory editor tab but  there is an infinity of values in the list!
      So my suggestion is put a search function in the memory editor tab in case of someone like me needs to find a determined value in this list. Would be a big help to me!
      Thanks !!! 
      ?
×
×
  • Create New...